Sheet 07 · Behind the scenes
Testing a Local Model for Made-Up Facts
Status: Built Tested by me. As of 30.09.2026.
In plain words
In tests, it pulls structure out of a dictation. Before use, it is asked for facts the dictation never contained, and a model that supplies one fails.
Title block
- Status
- Status: Built Tested by me.
- Engine
- Engine: a local model The model runs on a laptop.
- Human check
- Not in clinical use: this is the test a model must pass first.
Data touched · Reviewed
- Data touched
- Test material.
- Reviewed
- 30.09.2026 · Rev A
Runs on hardware Dr. Karni controls. As of 30.09.2026. Designed by me. Built with AI coding assistants.
Step 1 Extraction
Step 2 The made-up-fact test
Step 3 The limits
Text version
Step 1: a sample dictation about a sample procedure on a sample tooth becomes a card with Tooth, Procedure and Follow-up. Step 2: the dictation names no allergy, but an output says "Allergy: sample-substance", so it fails. Step 3: what the laptop model reads (extraction) and what it is not given (letters to patients, names from a photo).
What it does
A second AI engine on a laptop, limited to reading and extracting: in the tests, pulling the tooth, procedure and follow-up interval out of a dictation.
Before a model is used on any clinical note, it is asked for details the dictation never contained, such as a blood pressure, an allergy or a previous visit. A model that supplies one fails and is not used on clinical text. This is a gate, not a clinical validation.
Two tasks did not pass: letters to patients, and names read from a photographed sample screen. Neither is given to a local model today.
How it works
- A model pulls the tooth, procedure and interval out of a dictation.
- It is asked for facts the dictation never contained.
- Each question is asked several times.
- A run fails only on evidence of a made-up fact, not on wording.
- One made-up fact, and the model is not used on clinical text.
What it will not do
- Write letters to patients. That test failed.
- Read names from a photographed screen. A test on a sample screen failed.
- Count as a clinical validation. It is a gate.
For colleagues
Accuracy on an easy task says nothing about honesty on a hard one, so the gate asks for facts that are not there. A run fails only on positive evidence of an invented fact, not on wording.